Ixsystems iXR2124-216BE16R920LPB/2.5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIxsystems iXR2124-216BE16R920LPB/2.5  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 19:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.20GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 133
54% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 387
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 253 239 243 253 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 463
Write 326
Mixed 306
SusWrite 263
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 32.8
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 145
148% 243 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback