Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 03:09
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 857
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 172
Parallax 181
150% 179 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 102 99 95 86 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 482
Mixed 398
SusWrite 134
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 59.9
204% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 366
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
51GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,487
Write 1,636
Mixed 538
271% 1,220 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 75.6
262% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 377
456% 796 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75
7GB free
Firmware: 3.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 32
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 32
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 32%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
8GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 46 47 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 49
Write 48
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 43.9
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 43%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
49GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 107 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 107
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.7% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $870
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback