Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 586
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 7.2
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 256GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 140 104 223 219 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 420
Write 372
Mixed 354
SusWrite 185
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 40.9
141% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 252
195% 265 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84%
Great: 106%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
782GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 169 168 169 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 165
Mixed 111
SusWrite 169
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback