Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 17:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 456
60% 449 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
PNY(196E 1327) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 51.1
48% 55.7 fps
MRender 43.8
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 48.4
40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 160 193 191 200 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 307
Write 206
Mixed 209
SusWrite 199
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 24.1
91% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 54.8
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 171
125% 157 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
836GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 202 202 204 204 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 196
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 202
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 35.9
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.5
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback