Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 92.3 32% 55.7 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 150 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 39FF) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	3.09% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 5.2 3% 4.4 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.09% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX850 256GB 659 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0518BS Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 436 Write 90.4 Mixed 201 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 21.3 64% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 137 104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.M16FE Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 20GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1866, 1866 MHz 16384, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.9% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	293x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	27x

RAM
M471A5143SB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 2,091 samples	106x
RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBRamaxelBench 27%, 615 samples	39x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	34x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16