Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 08:23
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 264
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 620
67% 531 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 90
Parallax 78.5
77% 87.5 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 71.7
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M9PeG 256GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 184 184 223 192 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,629
Write 228
Mixed 336
SusWrite 193
128% 596 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 59
202% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 254
211% 311 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 155%
Great: 205%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
38GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,112
Write 6,178
Mixed 7,300
1,671% 7,530 MB/s
4K Read 628
4K Write 319
4K Mixed 398
1,631% 448 MB/s
DQ Read 1,759
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,205
944% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Ngff 2242 120GB SSD
58GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 272 61 51 50 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 471
Write 394
Mixed 324
SusWrite 147
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 21.4
120% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 89.7
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 27.8
76% 152 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SBC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 114 114 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 82.4
Write 106
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 114
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
109% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 176 176 177 177 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 116
Write 134
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 176
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.8
266% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
I-O DATA HDEL-UT 3TB
438GB free, PID 0160
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 174 176 177 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 174
Write 172
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 174
181% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 67%
BUFFALO HD-EDS-A 3TB
25GB free, PID 02cc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 71.9
Write 77.6
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 115
113% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 80%
I-O DATA HDCZ-UT 3TB
555GB free, PID 016c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 136 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 125
Write 129
Mixed 102
SusWrite 136
168% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
129GB free, PID 0286
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 145 148 148 147 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 146
Write 113
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 145
160% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 76%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 500GB
69GB free, PID 0290
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 61 64 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 76.5
Write 72
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 60.7
79% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 37%
I-O DATA HDPC-U 750GB
21GB free, PID 0135
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 23.2
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 23.7
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGU88C-26N190A 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 35.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 34.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback