Asus X456UAM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X456UAM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X456UAM
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 04:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 33%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 132
57% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 196
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 11B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5174
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.8
5% 4.73 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 211 248 234 246 247 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 367
Write 328
Mixed 270
SusWrite 231
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 11.2
45% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 28.8
71% 143 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A2 1324 J641GU42J2320NL 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X456UAM Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X456UAM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback