Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A544

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A544  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB35
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 09:38
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259
On Board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 70
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 98.1
50% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 174
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17A9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5M mSATA 256GB-$240
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 182 221 195 218 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 239
Write 223
Mixed 194
SusWrite 204
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 23.7
83% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 130
109% 159 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 96%
Generic External 1TB
80GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 40 38 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 39.1
Write 37
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 38.8
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 17.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK A544 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A544

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback