Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170505
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '21 at 06:33
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 58.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 230 73% 136 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 762 73% 603 Pts	64-Core 984 61% 984 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 139 Parallax 141 107% 137 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 136 Splatting 118 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 33 34 34 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	314% Outstanding	Read 4,006 Write 41.5 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 33.5 216% 1,041 MB/s	4K Read 374 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 5 574% 127 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 314% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 192GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 290 281 288 273 271 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 482 Mixed 399 SusWrite 301 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 55 183% 63 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 124%
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,365 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 119GB free Firmware: AXM08D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 194 164 174 158 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48% Average	Read 244 Write 234 Mixed 206 SusWrite 180 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 18.6 76% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 70.4 DQ Mixed 23 37% 72 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 425GB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 115 115 115 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	67% Good	Read 118 Write 122 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 115 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 85%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 159 159 158 159 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 119 Write 110 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 158 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 762GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 88 90 93 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 90.9 Write 47 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 90.5 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.7% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.6 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 11.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $697

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)