Asus V-P8H67E

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus V-P8H67E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK V-P8H67E
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 187 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 373 48% 360 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 56.7 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 77.9 46% 64.4 fps	MRender 59.4 Gravity 60.1 Splatting 43.2 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 50 53 57 57 53 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 131 Write 135 Mixed 145 SusWrite 67.7 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 21.2 82% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 70.7 DQ Mixed 28.6 28% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 466GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 119 124 126 126 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 115 Write 105 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 124 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.5% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 80.9 50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical V-P8H67E Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P8H67E

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	40x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	25x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	14x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 16GBKingstonBench 56%, 9 samples	4x
99U5471-020.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 947 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $212

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16