Samsung RV413/RV513

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemSamsung RV413/RV513  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV413/RV413
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 06:19
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 40.3
35% 46.3 Pts
4-Core 38
8-Core 40.4
5% 39.2 Pts
64-Core 40.6
2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sanyo(144D C589) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 71 69 70 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 52.2
Write 42
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 68.5
31% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1B0873EV 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV413/RV513 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV413/RV513

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback