Lenovo 5485AN7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 5485AN7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory0.9 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101102
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 02:42
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 94.4
39% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 75.2
8-Core 108
12% 91.5 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Gigabyte(1458 2557) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 6.9
6% 7.07 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 6.5
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 61 49 72 51 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 73.7
Write 79.2
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 55.5
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 53%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
132GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 137 163 160 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 156
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 156
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS256MLK72V3U Hynix HMT112U6BFR8C-G7 Samsung M391B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 7GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5485AN7 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 5485AN7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback