Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite E205 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091210
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '21 at 00:19
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 430 14,318 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 60.6 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 107 44% 73.5 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 150 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF17) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: PB4OC64G SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 55 50 62 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 78.2 Write 50.8 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 54.1 41% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GB 2,358 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	11x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	4x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	3x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	3x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $85