MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7998
MotherboardMSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 21:38
Run Duration367 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 252
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 704
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2059 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 116
Parallax 106
88% 110 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 106
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0411B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1131 1025 982 1006 995 991 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,406
Write 1,896
Mixed 199
SusWrite 1,021
305% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 68.4
232% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 441
388% 595 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 260%
Great: 373%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
188GB free
Firmware: SS0411B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 1029 1028 1027 1031 1018 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,024
Write 1,005
Mixed 918
SusWrite 1,101
280% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 48.3
177% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 585
470% 652 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 233%
Great: 373%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
106GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 231 233 232 230 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 477
Mixed 346
SusWrite 260
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 50.1
166% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 332
258% 353 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
48GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 63.8
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 63.6
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
212GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 144 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 90.9
Write 105
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 143
65% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 108%
LaCie Mobile Drive 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 10bc
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 106 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 79.5
Write 104
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 104
128% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 26.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) Builds (Compare 1,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $733
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback