Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 42.1 1-Core 11.3 2-Core 20.7 19% 24.7 Pts	4-Core 35 8-Core 38.6 5% 36.8 Pts	64-Core 39.4 2% 39.4 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.7 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 307 310 312 299 314 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 236 Write 258 Mixed 241 SusWrite 312 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 13.9 37% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 47.1 DQ Mixed 94.7 66% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FSGG45F-D8KQB Samsung M471B2873EH1-CH9 9GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 1024 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	3x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GBBench 92%, 5,131 samples	1x

RAM
FSGG45F-D8KQB Samsung M471B2873EH1-CH9 9GBUnknownBench 20%, 5 samples	2x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 2,766 samples	1x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16