Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics176% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140408
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 14:37
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 154
58% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 462
44% 364 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37B9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 215
Parallax 277
201% 246 fps
MRender 276
Gravity 249
Splatting 171
183% 232 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 176%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 236 196 167 171 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 369
Write 320
Mixed 299
SusWrite 189
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 45.4
150% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 245
184% 247 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 339 412 398 400 410 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 498
Write 414
Mixed 406
SusWrite 369
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 24.9
113% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 40.5
73% 140 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 134%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 135 137 134 133 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 121
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 133
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
506GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 89 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 87.2
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 87.2
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 13.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback