Lenovo 82AB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82AB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201221
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 10:46
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 250
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 577
63% 500 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3811) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6230
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 49.2
Reflection 52.3
Parallax 45.6
40% 49 fps
MRender 52.5
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 42
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 821 851 819 799 789 786 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 894
Write 1,353
Mixed 1,120
SusWrite 811
237% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 62.5
201% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 700
500% 656 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 176%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5ANAG6NCMR-XNC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 25.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82AB Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82AB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback