Gigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 222%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive474% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 01:04
Run Duration361 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 340
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,251
114% 956 Pts
64-Core 3,106
192% 3,106 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 298
Parallax 323
251% 309 fps
MRender 348
Gravity 256
Splatting 189
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4668 2665 2323 2083 1863 1802 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
474% Outstanding
Read 3,203
Write 4,792
Mixed 3,293
SusWrite 2,567
784% 3,464 MB/s
4K Read 81.6
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 109
397% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,695
DQ Write 1,342
DQ Mixed 1443
1,100% 1,493 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 474%
Great: 573%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
510GB free
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2312 2101 2071 1795 1266 1085 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 3,118
Write 2,468
Mixed 2,603
SusWrite 1,772
558% 2,490 MB/s
4K Read 79.5
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 104
370% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,712
DQ Write 1,445
DQ Mixed 1,506
1,148% 1,554 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 417%
Great: 573%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
649GB free
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2535 2534 2514 2516 2490 2508 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 3,129
Write 2,522
Mixed 2,508
SusWrite 2,516
600% 2,669 MB/s
4K Read 79.4
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 104
370% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,687
DQ Write 1397
DQ Mixed 1,487
1,128% 1,524 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 461%
Great: 573%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
242GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 443 430 421 369 335 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 456
Mixed 435
SusWrite 407
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 55.1
181% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 218
163% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
374GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 81 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 75.4
Write 76.6
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 79.7
94% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 61.8
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 37.3
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 39.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 128%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570S GAMING X Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback