Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 16:49
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 195
2-Core 389
119% 226 Pts
4-Core 781
8-Core 1,561
138% 1,171 Pts
64-Core 1,870
116% 1,870 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 119%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 188
Parallax 436
159% 273 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 194
Splatting 230
197% 243 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 158%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1221 1166 943 704 721 707 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,075
Write 1413
Mixed 877
SusWrite 910
293% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 69.1
281% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1273
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 450
433% 708 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 261%
Great: 283%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
132GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 157 240 149 116 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.3% Very good
Read 217
Write 86.4
Mixed 184
SusWrite 184
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 36.6
128% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 168
148% 217 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
333GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 84 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 105
Write 77.1
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 83.3
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 96%
WD WUH721414ALE604 14TB
10TB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 230 234 239 245 242 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 140%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 126 123 128 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 116
Write 119
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS726060ALA640 6TB
562GB free
Firmware: AHGNT1EN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 104 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 95.8
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 102
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 41
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 39.7
112% 39.2 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 136%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 5,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) - $201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,050
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback