Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 16:28
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 196
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 473
54% 419 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 99 59 96 58 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 425
Write 372
Mixed 252
SusWrite 96.8
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 5.7
44% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 33.7
36% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 168 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 134
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 170
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBRL HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback