| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| System | Razer Blade R2 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte Blade |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121019 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 21 '21 at 11:44 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3632QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
70.5%
Very good
|
66% 110 Pts
|
44% 346 Pts
|
25% 405 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 6745) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
|
3.32%
Terrible
|
3% 6.27 fps
|
3% 4.13 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 434 438 431 430 441 MB/s
|
98.1%
Outstanding
|
92% 410 MB/s
|
122% 39.7 MB/s
|
121% 261 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
56.3%
Above average
|
56% 19.6 GB/s
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
57% 69.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Blade R2 Builds (Compare 11 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Razer Blade R2
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 8x |
| GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |