Packard EasyNote LX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Packard EasyNote LX (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJM70-CP
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '21 at 19:36
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%
CPU Throttled	95%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	43% Average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 72.2 41% 61.5 Pts	4-Core 97.6 8-Core 96.9 13% 97.2 Pts	64-Core 96.3 6% 96.3 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0475) 3.8GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 480GB 1,715 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 287GB free (System drive) Firmware: R042 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 140 197 197 202 196 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.6% Average	Read 222 Write 206 Mixed 205 SusWrite 188 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 21 66% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 146 110% 147 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 217%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 115GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0 0.1 0.8 0.9 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.34% Terrible	Read 26.5 Write 21.7 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 0.5 21% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.34% Great: 60%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 3TB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 7GB free, PID 5071 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.8% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 23.8 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 8 21% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.8% Great: 21%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 28.3 Write 23.5 Mixed 24 32% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 18GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.4 16 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 21.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 11.4 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 3TB 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.8 7.5 7.6 7.5 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 8 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 59%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 3GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.5 7.5 7.6 7.5 7.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 29 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 8 26% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 9GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.7 7.5 7.6 7.5 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 28 Write 22.5 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 8 26% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CH9 2x4GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 7.1 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote LX Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LX

CPU
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	3x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	6x
Mobility Radeon HD 5850AMDBench 7%, 1,228 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 480GBLexarBench 121%, 1,715 samples	2x
SSD220 240GBTranscend $35Bench 71%, 12,548 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	2x
M471B5273EB0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 53 samples	2x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,533 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16