Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 860
81% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,269
78% 1,269 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 104
62% 83.5 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 53.9
55% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 259 303 360 266 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 335
Write 261
Mixed 301
SusWrite 305
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 45
131% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 250
196% 272 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 114%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
375GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 455 453 451 424 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 418
Mixed 350
SusWrite 436
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 35.1
120% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 279
214% 286 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97%
Great: 125%
I0MEGA UMni128MB*IOM2H4 0GB
0GB free, PID 2168
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 7
8% 6.47 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 1.87 MB/s
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 34.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 22.9
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 105%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 33.8
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 20.2
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 27.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $354
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback