Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200121
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Memory 88.7 1-Core 150 2-Core 297 97% 179 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 986 96% 785 Pts	64-Core 997 62% 997 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% Sapphire(1DA2 E411) Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.10.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 127 Parallax 163 92% 134 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 115 Splatting 78.5 78% 97.9 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 350 352 350 353 351 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 450 Mixed 420 SusWrite 352 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 37.9 178% 64.8 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 252 218% 322 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 128%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54 40,725 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 156GB free Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 269 269 270 269 270 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 267 Mixed 296 SusWrite 269 73% 329 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 40.8 150% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 197 165% 237 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2x8GB 2,111 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 24.4 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 24.7 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	394x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	344x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	118x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	85x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	74x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	130x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	49x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	62x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16