Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 03:03
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 314
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,152
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 1674
104% 1674 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 182
Parallax 429
154% 267 fps
MRender 296
Gravity 135
Splatting 220
177% 217 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 481 482 479 289 287 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 485
Mixed 449
SusWrite 416
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 52.7
181% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
TOSHIBA-RD500 1TB
532GB free
Firmware: ECFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2500 1562 972 959 999 993 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,364
Write 2,383
Mixed 1,558
SusWrite 1,331
376% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 61.6
210% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,402
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,244
923% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 255%
Great: 277%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
255GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 101
Write 96.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 68.3
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
28GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 133 127 146 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 136
Write 137
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 152
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
22GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 74 73 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43% Average
Read 76.6
Write 71.5
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 72.9
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
370GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 78 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 66.5
Write 67.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 75.9
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
455GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 76.5
107% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
338GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49% Average
Read 145
Write 138
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 120
136% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 18.9
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback