Foxconn A76ML-K 30

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn A76ML-K 30  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80
Socket AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 86.4
39% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 140
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
PNY(196E 0915) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 163 134 132 134 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 181
Write 157
Mixed 147
SusWrite 146
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 17.6
63% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 25.4
22% 31 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 2TB
2TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 22 13 13 7.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 98
Write 97.2
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 18.3
84% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 44%
hp x702w 126GB
116GB free, PID da07
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 84 90 88 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 147
Write 94.9
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 84.6
126% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 53%
Patriot Memory 64GB
58GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.6 5.7 6.7 5.5 6.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.33% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 2.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.3
10% 8.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RM51264BA1339.16FR RM51264BA1339.16FR 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A76ML-K 30 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A76ML-K 30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback