MSI H370M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B24
MotherboardMSI H370M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 14:31
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 734
80% 632 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 144 54 53 55 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 483
Write 432
Mixed 394
SusWrite 85.2
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 42.4
142% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 236
195% 278 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
255GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 78 72 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 76.6
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 84%
Generic 1TB
697GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 194 194 194 194 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 139
Write 113
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 193
177% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR11 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR11 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR11 16GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24) Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H370M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback