HP h8-1440t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP h8-1440t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121003
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 12:39
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 113
49% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 406
38% 318 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1131 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 9.8
8% 8.87 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 15
Splatting 7
8% 10.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 166 160 153 150 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 418
Write 165
Mixed 193
SusWrite 158
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 24.6
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 214
174% 252 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
192GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 74 74 73 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 70.4
Write 63.2
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 72.7
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 22
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1440t Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP h8-1440t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback