Lenovo 2325B15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2325B15  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325B15
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 12:20
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 149
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 217
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT49D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 126 131 124 109 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 242
Write 96.7
Mixed 116
SusWrite 116
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 16.7
61% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 87.6
DQ Mixed 38.1
34% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 71%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
839GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 430 431 410 435 428 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 462
Write 421
Mixed 390
SusWrite 421
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 31.8
99% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 70.9
DQ Mixed 296
155% 131 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2325B15 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2325B15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback