Tarox Midrange Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTarox Midrange Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z170-A
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 11:10
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 225
87% 151 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 748
81% 641 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 87
Parallax 77.5
62% 80 fps
MRender 78.2
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 67.4
60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 442 427 435 438 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 447
Mixed 370
SusWrite 426
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 45.9
146% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
409GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 156 162 166 167 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 154
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 160
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
646GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 101 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
42% Average
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 101
125% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.M8FA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Midrange Workstation Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Tarox Midrange Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback