Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 03:11
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 932
85% 712 Pts
64-Core 1359
84% 1359 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 105
62% 83.7 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 82.5
Splatting 53.9
55% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 390 409 302 395 325 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 343
Mixed 286
SusWrite 356
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 45.3
152% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 210
180% 264 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
375GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 446 449 452 401 342 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 418
Mixed 345
SusWrite 423
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 35.3
120% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 277
213% 284 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 125%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 23
38% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 105%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 28.4
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 20.1
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 28.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback