HP p7-1010mem

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1010mem  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110517
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 150
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 231
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.8
4% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 7.3
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0815B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 87 67 71 69 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 219
Write 150
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 81
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 15.1
58% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 125
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 83%
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
184GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 215 215 219 218 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.2% Above average
Read 248
Write 211
Mixed 228
SusWrite 216
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 26.1
90% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 186
139% 186 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86
643GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 131 132 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 130
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76%
Great: 98%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
207GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 170 147 151 169 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 176
Mixed 35
SusWrite 160
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 7R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 21% 34 74 58 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ORM0000 DIGITAL
History: Score 8: 0R 2G 2B | Score 29: 5R 1G 1B | Score 35: 7R 0G 0B
Typical p7-1010mem Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1010mem

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback