Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20110322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration	431573 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 87.4 1-Core 48.8 2-Core 96.9 51% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 248 26% 207 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650 17 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sapphire(174B 5920) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.22% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.22% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 512GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 130 67 197 31 165 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.9% Average	Read 222 Write 188 Mixed 194 SusWrite 130 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 21.4 89% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 44.2 58% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.6% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 11.1 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $242

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16