Lenovo 80JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80JM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Flex 3-1570
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160803
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 01:48
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 114
57% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 191
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3820) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 6.4
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 298 326 327 319 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 360
Write 344
Mixed 328
SusWrite 322
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 38.2
107% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 290
235% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80JM Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback