HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 21:59
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 179
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 496
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2667) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 32.6
19% 31.6 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 26.4
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TK0120GECQL 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 303 299 312 307 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 353
Write 276
Mixed 283
SusWrite 303
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 38.5
130% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 253
208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
885GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 177 179 180 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 163
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 177
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 33.2
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback