HP Pro 3305 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3305 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1h
Memory5.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110629
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 21:10
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 91.8
48% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 226
25% 198 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Device(1B0A 908F) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.47 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.6
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 39 42 37 45 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 6.7
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 38.7
10% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 13%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3305 Series Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3305 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback