ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20HK003FUS

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20HK003FUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20HK003FUS
Memory	49 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210505
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '21 at 17:41
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 1,822 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 225 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 575 59% 476 Pts	64-Core 566 35% 566 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 598 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Legend(17AA 2250) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1501 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.4% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 63.5 56% 66.3 fps	MRender 62.6 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 70.4 55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 471 19 43 49 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	157% Outstanding	Read 1,431 Write 892 Mixed 878 SusWrite 106 183% 827 MB/s	4K Read 53 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 65.2 230% 81.3 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 631 DQ Mixed 219 243% 400 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 242%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 380GB free Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1637 929 614 623 622 622 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 2079 Write 1,493 Mixed 1,404 SusWrite 841 324% 1,454 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 60.7 222% 75.5 MB/s	DQ Read 976 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 743 558% 757 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 296%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 89 108 101 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 87.4 Write 8.2 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 99.4 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.3 234% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 68%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB 18,166 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 113 113 115 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 173 Write 72.3 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 112 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.8 204% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD KHX2666C15S4/16G 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 64GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 26 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 24 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 20HK003FUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

System: Lenovo 20HK003FUS

CPU
Xeon E3-1535M v6IntelBench 73%, 1,822 samples	10x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 54%, 598 samples	7x
HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples	3x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	8x
LENSE20512GMSP34MEAT2TA 512GBBench 129%, 1,467 samples	1x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $155Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	3x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 3x8GBHynixBench 65%, 22 samples	2x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 73%, 430 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback