Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '21 at 13:44
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 63.1 2-Core 127 52% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 250 28% 222 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 35 37 34 34 34 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.8% Below average	Read 194 Write 38 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 36.6 19% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 14.1 56% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 49.3 75% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 241GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 92 96 88 88 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 71 Write 78.7 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 83.9 52% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 113%
MD10000-BLDW-RO 1TB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 53GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 74 78 80 80 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 85.8 Write 83.1 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 75.4 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 64%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 54GB free Firmware: G009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 88 91 91 92 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 99.6 Write 91.3 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 85.1 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2600 C10 2x4GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 15.1 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 0.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	752x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	509x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	386x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	151x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	145x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	75x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	70x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	66x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	55x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16