HP h8-1012it

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP h8-1012it  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 13:23
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 161
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 461
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 2
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$35
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 274 186 114 225 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 329
Write 105
Mixed 259
SusWrite 234
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 31.9
116% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 229
183% 256 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 102%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
145GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 316 313 316 311 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 437
Mixed 431
SusWrite 330
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 42.5
133% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 264
194% 254 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 129%
WD My Passport 083C 996GB
129GB free, PID 083c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 48 17 13 12 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 53.5
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 21.3
44% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 500GB
115GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 64.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 74.5
84% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 39%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB
122GB free, PID 022b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 26.1
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 25.6
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Samsung M2 Portable 3 750GB
166GB free, PID 60c5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 27.3
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1012it Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1012it

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback