Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 19 '17 at 22:06
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 174
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 474
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.7% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 54.3
52% 62 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 65.2
52% 63.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston120 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
raid1 1TB
25GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: UDMA 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 281
Write 215
Mixed 36.8
128% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.51
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 142%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback