Asus ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX434IQ
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 07:19
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
83% 157 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 581
66% 515 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Asus(1043 1092) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 20.6
14% 22.9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 16.2
11% 12.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 228 205 190 170 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,047
Write 281
Mixed 487
SusWrite 222
112% 509 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 60.6
210% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 537
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 310
300% 472 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 145%
Great: 153%
SD Card 126GB
94GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 12 17 1.9 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 24
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 11.1
30% 24 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
89% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT53E512M32D2NP-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 30.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 22
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback