Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210817
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 02:39
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 191
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 649
59% 496 Pts
64-Core 1,227
76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 86FC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 35.9
27% 38 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 50
Splatting 42.3
41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 250GB 250GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0426C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 220 222 224 224 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 399
Write 350
Mixed 322
SusWrite 224
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 33.2
110% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 111
147% 267 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 123%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: VB411D43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 928 994 1016 1007 978 987 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1713
Write 782
Mixed 870
SusWrite 985
242% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 47
160% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 796
583% 759 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 211%
Great: 273%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
767GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 204 203 206 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 85
Write 182
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 199
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 113%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
15GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.4 4 3.4 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.5
7% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2666C18-8GTZN 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 28.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback