Foxconn X38

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFoxconn X38  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn X38A
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080901
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$12
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 42.4
36% 47.8 Pts
4-Core 50.3
8-Core 49.5
7% 49.9 Pts
64-Core 32.9
2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(107D 20E0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.1
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Excelstor Technology J9250S 250GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM2OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 25 12 28 65 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 78.4
Write 72.4
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 37.3
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 50%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
304GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 61 62 61 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 71.1
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 60.5
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 2.1
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X38 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn X38

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $12
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback