Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10S
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 21:02
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 107
52% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 150
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Toshiba(1179 FA47) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 8.9
6% 9.17 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 8.9
6% 7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 193 192 308 263 213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 482
Write 438
Mixed 408
SusWrite 256
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 37
121% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 204
151% 201 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 18.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE P50-A-13F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback