Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 728
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,473
91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 27
Parallax 32.2
20% 27.9 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 24
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 360 359 358 360 368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 378
Mixed 308
SusWrite 359
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 34.2
119% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 276
224% 319 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
197GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69% Good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 103
SusWrite 118
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback