TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProDesk 405 G4 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 405 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E8
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 190
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 548
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 60%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1140 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.1
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 19.6
12% 20 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 20
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 13.1%
 Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 932
Write 814
Mixed 858
194% 868 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 60.1
194% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 333
270% 390 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 43.2%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ProDesk 405 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 405 G4 SFF

CPU
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Vega GraphicsAMDBench 69%, 1,159 samples8x
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Vega GraphicsAMDBench 61%, 1,792 samples4x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD  $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples1x
GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples8x
Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor GraphicsAMDBench 14%, 205 samples3x
RX 550AMD  $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples1x
SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples4x
hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GBSKBench 146%, 8,367 samples2x
NVMe SK hynix 256GBBc501Bench 110%, 8,328 samples1x
RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples3x
HP26D4U9S8MD-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 1,119 samples2x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback