HP 750-102ng

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 750-102ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 399
51% 387 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.49
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.1% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 37.4
32% 39.6 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 32.5
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 412
Write 287
Mixed 204
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 36.3
132% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 189
157% 230 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
44GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 97 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 166
Write 165
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 97
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-102ng Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 750-102ng

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback