Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E 191 User benchmarks, average bench 31% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	25.5% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 39.5 23% 34.5 Pts	4-Core 62.2 8-Core 61 8% 61.6 Pts	64-Core 40.4 2% 40.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics 168 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8158) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 3.4 1% 2.4 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 2.6 2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB 10,347 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 97 89 84 92 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 354 Write 112 Mixed 131 SusWrite 95.1 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 32.3 100% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 134 107% 150 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 89%
PSSBN032GA27MC0 32GB 30GB free Firmware: SBFH00A8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 11 6.8 7.1 11 8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB 26,973 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7EAMDBench 31%, 191 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R7E GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 168 samples	2x

SSD
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	2x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	1x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16