Lenovo 82JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 12:05
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 466
52% 407 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A4F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.81
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 165
Parallax 145
125% 154 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 119
Splatting 115
106% 132 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 115%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1101 1TB
915GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11190001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1834 1740 1733 1734 1736 1733 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 2,270
Mixed 1,860
SusWrite 1,752
446% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 69.3
231% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 717
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 672
488% 636 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 288%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JQ Builds (Compare 3,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback