Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10S
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130925
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 11:50
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 146
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 216
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Toshiba(1179 FA47) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 9.6
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
703GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Read 37.8
Write 33.4
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 3.7
6% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.8
10% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 29%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 43 58 57 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 88.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 57.1
48% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
955GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 26.3
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 3.6
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
955GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 29.6
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 3.6
17% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 29.5
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 3.7
18% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11%
Great: 103%
Seagate OneTouch HDD 4TB
478GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 83 85 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
40% Average
Read 55.2
Write 77.6
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 83.4
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
151% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 2TB
477GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 26.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 3.6
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB
372GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.8
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 3.6
27% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 44%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
181GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 26.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 3.6
28% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 22%
WD 6400AAK External 640GB
201GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 30.6
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 3.6
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE P50-A-13F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback